Turn interview notes from three people into one recommendation
Everyone who met the candidate wrote notes. One summary shows where they agreed, where they did not, and what to check.
Three people interview a candidate and write notes in three different places. Comparing them means booking another meeting, or making the call on whoever argues hardest. The disagreements, which are the useful part, get lost.
Plugs into
These are examples. Every use case is built around the tools you already run, whatever they are, and you keep using them exactly as before.
Then it runs on its own
- 1
Collects the notes and recordings from every interviewer
- 2
Lines them up against the criteria for the role
- 3
Finds where the panel agreed and where it split
- 4
Writes one recommendation per candidate
Delivered where you already work
Once the last interviewer has filed their notes, in whichever channel your team already uses. We set the timing around how you work, not the other way round.
What you get back
- One summary per candidate, against the criteria for the role
- Where the interviewers agreed and where they disagreed
- What still needs checking before making an offer
What it actually looks like
The real output, using sample data. Every line traces back to the source it came from.
Ready as soon as the last notes land
We build it with your team
Every workshop is built around the use cases you pick. This one is usually covered in the Accelerator, on your own tools and your own data.
- We use notes from a real hiring process, with names removed
- Your team learns how to write notes that stay useful afterwards
- The summary follows the criteria you actually hire on
Want it extended, maintained and connected to more of your systems afterwards? Let's discuss →
Want this running in your team?
30 minutes. Tell us what your team spends its week on and we'll tell you which of these would save the most time.